Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | — | — | — | 50 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 58 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 54 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 54 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 27 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMILY KUNASH | Board President | — | ||
| TRACY PARR | Secretary | — | ||
| JUSTIN CHARLES | VICE PRESIDE | — | ||
| KELSEY WAUGHON | Treasurer | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELAINE CASHMORE | Board President | — | ||
| JORDAN RAKITTKE | VICE PRESIDE | — | ||
| TRACEY LANMAN | Secretary | — | ||
| ROGER ZAWACKI | Treasurer | — |
Tax year 2022
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELAINE CASHMORE | Board President | — | ||
| JORDAN RADKITKE | VICE PRESIDE | — | ||
| AARON GOMEZ | Secretary | — | ||
| ROGER ZAWACKI | Treasurer | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRAVIS GREUEL | Board President | — | ||
| SHANNON LEE DAY | VICE PRESIDE | — | ||
| AARON GOMEZ | Secretary | — | ||
| ROGER ZAWACKI | Treasurer | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 376 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: governance score sits 17 points below the peer median (50 vs. 67).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.