Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Programmatic Contraction

What does this mean?

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

The Path Forward

The Rainmaker

Represents the forced release of hoarded resources back into the community. It acts as a pressure valve against administrative capture, ensuring the mission takes priority over the machine.

The Rainmaker
The Rainmaker
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Programmatic Contraction
Overall
32
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Programmatic Contraction

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 22.5% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 19.9% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 13.4% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 10.9% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 7.1% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jena Schieb Education Manager 2,137.9% of Rev
Meg Prall Retail Manager 1,723.6% of Rev
Kathryn J McGrady Executive Director 896.2% of Rev
Samantha Bower Artist Manager 390.8% of Rev
Harold Behar Board Member
Anne German Board Member
Christine Bower Board Member
Marina Nielson Board Member
Jaime Simmons Board Member
Gonzalo Bird Munoz Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kathryn J McGrady Executive Director 2,542.4% of Rev
Meg Prall Retail Manager 1,686.1% of Rev
Jena Schieb Education Manager 1,116.7% of Rev
Samantha Bower Artist Manager 803.4% of Rev
Harold Behar Board Member
Anne German Board Member
Christine Bower Board Member
Marina Nielson Board Member
Jaime Simmons Board Member
Gonzalo Bird Munoz Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Daniel Fox Operations Manager 929.7% of Rev
Samantha Bower Artist Manager 922.9% of Rev
Kathryn J McGrady Executive Director 132.8% of Rev
Harold Behar Board Member
Hans Tandon Board Member
Anne German Board Member
Christine Bower Board Member
Scott Hunter Board Member
Marina Nielson Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
32 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 296 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points below the peer median (5 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Programmatic Contraction

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

Overall score has gone from 29 → 32 over 5 years (improving by 3 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.