Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2022 | — | — | 28.4% | 36 | Fragile | Gov Risk | |
| 2021 | — | — | 28.6% | 44 | Governance-Stressed | Recovery | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Michaelson | Board Member | 17.1% of Rev | ||
| Glenn Hendrick | Board Member | 7.3% of Rev | ||
| Shelle Cropper | Treasurer | — | ||
| Danielle Dean | Board Member | — | ||
| Guiseppi Spadafora | Board Member | — | ||
| Sarah Benson | Secretary | — | ||
| Malcom Suttles | Board President | — | ||
| John Wheatley | Board President | — | ||
| Timber Rose | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2022
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glenn Hendrick | Board Member | 6.8% of Rev | ||
| Maria Michaelson | Board Member | 5.9% of Rev | ||
| Shelle Cropper | Treasurer | — | ||
| Danielle Dean | Board Member | — | ||
| Guiseppi Spadafora | Board Member | — | ||
| Sarah Benson | Secretary | — | ||
| Malcom Suttles | Board Member | — | ||
| John Wheatley | Board President | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Fewer than 3 peers found in WA for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 41 → 45 over 4 years (improving by 4 points).
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.