Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Insufficient Data

What does this mean?

Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.

Institutional Health Scores
Overall
46
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 46 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Emily Cravens Board President
Alynn Kluczinski Vice Presicent
Tom Kluczinski Treasurer
Nikki DeWees Secretary
Jessica Cook Fundraising
Kelly Burton Communications
Emily Cravens Board President
MariaCarmen Perez Vice Presicent
Mark Perez Treasurer
Sara Price Secretary
Kathy Etienne Fundraising
Nax Nodjoumi Communications
Nikki Dewees Volunteers/Concessions
Ann Ramirez Sponsorships
Tracy Smith Grants
Emily Cravens Board President
Sharis Brown Oversight/Accountability
MariaCarmen Perez Vice Presicent
Mark Perez Treasurer
Sara Rodriguez Secretary
Kathy Etienne Fundraising
Naz Nodjoumi Communications
Elaine Peterson Volunteers/Concessions
Ann Ramirez Sponsorships
Tracy Smith Grants
Sharis Brown Oversight/Accountability
Nikki DeWees Mentorship

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kelly Burton Communications
MariCarmen Perez Volunteers/Concessions
Sara Price Sponsorships
Alessandra Alves Mentor
Janice Graves Oversight/Accountability
Emily Cravens Board President
Alynn Kluczinski Vice Presicent
Tom Kluczinski Treasurer
Nikki DeWees Secretary
Jessica Cook Fundraising
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 22 points above the peer median (55 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Insufficient Data

Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.