Governance Lag
What does this mean?
Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.
The Path Forward
The Scaffold
Brings immediate structural maturity. It represents the necessity of outside, independent oversight to manage new scale, breaking the echo chamber of a founding 'friends and family' board.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 45 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2022 | — | — | 42.0% | 30 | Critical Intervention Needed | Recovery | |
| 2021 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 25 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 44 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 31 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALISHA SIEBERS | EXECUTIVE DI | 23.6% of Rev | ||
| SYDNEY BASTOS | Board President | — | ||
| MICHAEL PHILLIPS | BOARD SECRET | — | ||
| JON R WALLACE | Treasurer | — | ||
| MARK GIACOBONE | Board Member | — | ||
| JAKE MUNSON | Board Member | — | ||
| NANCY MACKENZIE | Board Member | — | ||
| GINA SZPACK | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2022
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SYD BASTOS | Board President | — | ||
| REX CUMMINGS | Treasurer | — | ||
| LISA BEAMS | INTERIM SECR | — | ||
| JAKE MUNSON | Board Member | — | ||
| MICHAEL PHILLIPS | Board Member | — | ||
| JENNIFER WOLFENBARGER | Board Member | — | ||
| JODI NOBLE | Board Member | — | ||
| KELLY BERGLAND | Board Member | — | ||
| DEB CHRISTIANSEN | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 177 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A2.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 31 points below the peer median (40 vs. 71).
5-year trend: Governance Lag
Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.
Overall score has gone from 31 → 45 over 5 years (improving by 14 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
- Two consecutive years of deficit spending.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.