Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
55
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2022 55 Fragile Recovery
2021 42 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 62 Stable Stable Watch
2019 50 Fragile Recovery
2018 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEBRA ZAVATSKY Board President
GERALDINE KRAUS Board President
SANDI FIELDS Board President
KELLY DAWSON Board President
SHERYL TUCKER Board President
MICHELE PABUWAL Board President
JOSEFINA MACIEL Treasurer
VENUS INCE Secretary
KENRICK EAGER Board Member
CAROL SUCHIT-HUDSON Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEBRA ZAVATSKY Board President
GERALDINE KRAUS Board President
SANDI FIELDS Board President
KELLY DAWSON Board President
SHERYL TUCKER Board President
MICHELE PABUWAL Board President
JOSEFINA MACIEL Treasurer
VENUS INCE Secretary
KENRICK EAGER Board Member
CAROL SUCHIT-HUDSON Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEBRA ZAVATSKY Board President
GERALDINE KRAUS Board President
SANDI FIELDS Board President
KELLY DAWSON Board President
SHERYL TUCKER Board President
MICHELE PABUWAL Board President
JOSEFINA MACIEL Treasurer
VENUS INCE Secretary
KENRICK EAGER Board Member
CAROL SUCHIT-HUDSON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 176 other orgs in NJ with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 56 points above the peer median (90 vs. 34).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

Overall score has gone from 55 → 55 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.