Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
31
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2022 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — — 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Rebecca Shields Secretary —
Kristin Lohfeld Treasurer —
Stacia Kelly Board President —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Rebecca Shields Secretary —
Kristin Lohfeld Treasurer —
Stacia Kelly Board President —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Shanitra Davis-Howard Board President —
Vice President Secretary —
Kim Morand Treasurer —
Gary Berkheimer Board President —
Laurie Walther Board President —
Shanitra Davis-Howard Board President —
Vice President Secretary —
Kim Morand Treasurer —
Gary Berkheimer Board President —
Laurie Walther Board President —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 243 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 24 points below the peer median (5 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 38 → 31 over 4 years (declining by 7 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.