Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
34
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 30.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2023 21 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 26.5% 40 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 24.3% 39 Fragile Recovery
2019 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Anya Clarke Artistic Director 15.1% of Rev
Mitsuko Verdery Artistic Director 15.1% of Rev
Niya Nicholson Board President
Rie Schmidt Treasurer
Michelle Mantia Secretary
Amber Ohiokpehai Board Member
Wendy Shafer Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Anya Clarke Artistic Director 29.7% of Rev
Mitsuko Verdery Artistic Director 19.6% of Rev
Niya Nicholson Board President
Rie Schmidt Treasurer
Michelle Mantia Secretary
Amber Ohiokpehai Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Anya Clarke Artistic Director 12.5% of Rev
Mitsuko Verdery Artistic Director 12.5% of Rev
Niya Nicholson Board Member
Natalie Marrero Board President
Rie Schmidt Treasurer
Michelle Mantia Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 24 points below the peer median (5 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 30.2% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~16 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.