Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 47 Fragile Recovery
2020 46 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNIFER DALTO Executive Director 24.0% of Rev
DONNA FERRIELL Treasurer 7.5% of Rev
RACHEL SPRATT Board President
AMANDA BULTEMEIER Board President
MEAGANN MANGER Secretary
KRISTEN CIRINO Board Member
DANIEL ZELLER Treasurer
KATIE CLARK Board Member
MATT HUMMEL Board Member
JOHN CROSSER Board Member
SHANA HARDIN Board Member
EBONY BAKER Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CORIE AIKEN Board Member
PAULA BOENIGK Board Member
MOLLI DUCKWORTH Board Member
PETER FELT Board Member
ALEXANDRA LUEGERS Board Member
AMANDA OVERBY Board Member
GRETCHEN ROSS Board Member
COLLEEN SCHOLER Board Member
BENJAMIN SHOULDERS Board Member
MINDY SAGEZ Board President
JUDITH KUNTZ Board President
LAURA DALTO Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 24 other orgs in IN with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 10 points above the peer median (55 vs. 45).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.