Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 47 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 46 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JENNIFER DALTO | Executive Director | 24.0% of Rev | ||
| DONNA FERRIELL | Treasurer | 7.5% of Rev | ||
| RACHEL SPRATT | Board President | — | ||
| AMANDA BULTEMEIER | Board President | — | ||
| MEAGANN MANGER | Secretary | — | ||
| KRISTEN CIRINO | Board Member | — | ||
| DANIEL ZELLER | Treasurer | — | ||
| KATIE CLARK | Board Member | — | ||
| MATT HUMMEL | Board Member | — | ||
| JOHN CROSSER | Board Member | — | ||
| SHANA HARDIN | Board Member | — | ||
| EBONY BAKER | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CORIE AIKEN | Board Member | — | ||
| PAULA BOENIGK | Board Member | — | ||
| MOLLI DUCKWORTH | Board Member | — | ||
| PETER FELT | Board Member | — | ||
| ALEXANDRA LUEGERS | Board Member | — | ||
| AMANDA OVERBY | Board Member | — | ||
| GRETCHEN ROSS | Board Member | — | ||
| COLLEEN SCHOLER | Board Member | — | ||
| BENJAMIN SHOULDERS | Board Member | — | ||
| MINDY SAGEZ | Board President | — | ||
| JUDITH KUNTZ | Board President | — | ||
| LAURA DALTO | Secretary | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 76 other orgs in IN with NTEE prefix A2.
Most-divergent component: governance score sits 24 points below the peer median (50 vs. 74).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
What's driving this score
- No individual risk drivers stand out. Overall score reflects component balance, not any single signal.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.