Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 7.1% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 4.6% 55 Fragile Recovery
2021 10.4% 42 Fragile Recovery
2020 10.4% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEPHANIE JOHNSON Board President 8.6% of Rev
JEAN KLUVER Board President
PAUL DEVERMANN Board President
FRANTZ FARREAU Secretary
JACI SANDER Treasurer
RACHEL MAVROTHALASITIS Board Member
KAREN HENKEN Board Member
JOLENE MAYER SHUMILAK Board Member
LORRAINE IVERSON Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEPHANIE JOHNSON Board President 5.6% of Rev
JEAN KLUVER Board President
PAUL DEVERMANN Board President
FRANTZ FARREAU Secretary
MIA HARENSKI Treasurer
KAREN HENKEN Board Member
LORRAINE IVERSON Board Member
JOLENE MAYER SHUMILAK Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Stephanie Johnson Executive Dir. 3.8% of Rev
Bill Hart Board Member
Jolene Shumilak Board Member
Doug Cooper Board Member
Jean Kluver Board Member
Mindy Stallings Board President
Lorraine Iverson Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.