Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
28
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
20
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 5.1% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2023 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 3.4% 40 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2021 40 Fragile Recovery
2020 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 47 Fragile Recovery
2017 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Amy Burgess Executive Director 3.4% of Rev
Jason Burgess Artistic Director 1.7% of Rev
Jayson Zoller Board President
Brianna Vollman Board President
Brad Martin Treasurer
Diane Carr Board Member
Matthew Starcher Board Member
DeShea Rawe Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jason Burgess Artistic Director 1.6% of Rev
Amy Burgess Executive Director 1.6% of Rev
Jayson Zoller Board President
Nanciann Moschner Board President
Taylor Strosnider Board Member
Brad Martin Board Member
Diane Carr Board Member
Michael Boberg Board President
Nanciann Moschner Board President
Joshua Rivers Treasurer
Taylor Strosnider Board Member
Jayson Zoller Board Member
Amy Burgess Executive Director
Jason Burgess Artistic Director
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
20 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
28 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 212 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 21 points below the peer median (20 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.