Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
38
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 17.7% 38 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2022 19.9% 38 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 14.4% 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 54 Fragile Recovery
2019 51 Fragile Recovery
2018 47 Fragile Recovery
2017 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 47 Fragile Recovery
2013 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MOLLY BEHRENS Board Member
KRIS CONTOR VICE PRESIDE
CAROL DEANER Board President
NANCY HASTINGS Board Member
KATHY HUBBARD Secretary
MARCELLA NELSON Board Member
JAN RUST Board Member
PIERCE SMITH Board Member
DYNO WAHL Board Member
NOELLE ZMUDA Board Member
JULINE ZUMWALT Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MOLLY BEHRENS Board Member
KRIS CONTOR VICE PRESIDE
CAROL DEANER Board President
NANCY HASTINGS Board Member
KATHY HUBBARD Secretary
MARCELLA NELSON Board Member
JAN RUST Board Member
PIERCE SMITH Board Member
DYNO WAHL Board Member
NOELLE ZMUDA Board Member
JULINE ZUMWALT Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ILENE BELL Board Member
STAN BIRNBAUM Board Member
KRIS CONTOR VICE PRESIDE
CAROL DEANER Board President
NANCY HASTINGS Board Member
KATHY HUBBARD Secretary
MARCELLA NELSON Board Member
PIERCE SMITH Board Member
DYNO WAHL Board Member
NOELLE ZMUDA Board Member
JULINE ZUMWALT Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
38 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 3 other orgs in ID with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 5 points below the peer median (45 vs. 50).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.