Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
55
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — — 55 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — — 56 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 — — — 40 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — — 40 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michele Gregson Board President —
Jennifer Sheehy Treasurer —
Tracy Stein Board Member —
Benna Strober Secretary —
Sena Baron Board Member —
Christie Krase Board Member —
Frank Shiner Board Member —
Jennifer Klein Board Member —
Elizabeth Schwarzwalder Board President —
Rachel Goren Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michele Gregson Board President —
Jennifer Sheehy Treasurer —
Tracy Stein Board President —
Benna Strober Secretary —
Sena Baron Board Member —
Christie Krase Board Member —
Frank Shiner Board Member —
Jennifer Klein Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michele Gregson Board President —
Jennifer Sheehy Treasurer —
Tracu Stein Board President —
Benna Strober Secretary —
Laurie Brecher Board Member —
Sena Baron Board Member —
Christie Krase Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,226 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 23 points above the peer median (75 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 40 → 55 over 4 years (improving by 15 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.