Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
28
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
20
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 35.0% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 43.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 18.5% 36 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Anna Kate Mohler Board President 18.5% of Rev
Andrew Zacharias Board President 18.5% of Rev

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Anna Kate Mohler Board President 14.2% of Rev
Andrew Zacharias Board President 12.9% of Rev

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Andrew Zacharias Board President 4.7% of Rev
Anna Kate Mohler Board President 4.4% of Rev
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
20 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
28 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 13 points below the peer median (20 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 36 → 28 over 4 years (declining by 8 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.