Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
23
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 44 Fragile Recovery
2020 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 59 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Karen Myers Treasurer
Roxi Beck Board President
Amy Fickhohm Board President
Melanie Wallace Secretary
Susin Bredice Board President
Erin Valerio-Garsaw Board President
Megan Anderson Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Karen Myers Treasurer
Erin Vallerio Garsow Board President
Melody Wallace Board President
Amy Fickbohm Board Member
Erin Murphy Board President
Julie Sleeper Secretary
LIsa West Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Karen Myers Treasurer
Lisa West Board President
Kali Cook Board President
Katie Murphy Board President
Erin Vallerio Garsow Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
23 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 86 other orgs in IA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 29 points below the peer median (10 vs. 39).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.