Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
50
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 0.3% 50 Fragile Recovery
2023 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Renate Thomas Librarian 0.3% of Rev
Mike Arnold Secretary
Dora Bronston Board President
Jackie Davis Board President
Matthew Dixon Legal Affaires
Dana Kolovson Treasurer
Gary Rasmussen Board President
Michael Shaffer Board President
Joanne Shaffer Personnal Manager

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Mike Arnold Secretary
Dora Bronston Public Relations
Jackie Davis Board President
Matthew Dixon Legal Affairs
Dana Kolovson Treasurer
Gary Rasmussen Board President
Michael Shaffer Board President
Fred Thiergartner C0-Fundraising
Genie Thiergartner Co-Fundraising
Renate Thomas Librarian
Joanne Shaffer Personnel Manager
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 212 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 24 points above the peer median (65 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.