Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | — | — | — | 38 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk | |
| 2022 | — | — | 20.0% | 36 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk | |
| 2021 | — | — | 17.8% | 36 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk | |
| 2020 | — | — | 15.0% | 40 | Fragile | Gov Risk | |
| 2019 | — | — | 3.1% | 55 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2018 | — | — | 4.3% | 55 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MICHAEL GALLAGHER | Board Member | — | ||
| JAY TUBBS | Board Member | — | ||
| JANET PETERSEN | Executive Director | — | ||
| JOHN WRIGHT | Board President | — | ||
| TANA GALLAGHER | Treasurer | — | ||
| SUSAN WRIGHT | Secretary | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MICHAEL GALLAGHER | Board Member | — | ||
| JANET PETERSEN | EXECUTIVE OFFICER | — | ||
| JAMES TUBBS | OFFICER | — | ||
| JOHN WRIGHT | Board President | — | ||
| TANA GALLAGHER | Treasurer | — | ||
| SUSAN WRIGHT | Secretary | — | ||
| MICHAEL GALLAGHER | Board Member | — | ||
| JANET PETERSEN | Board Member | — | ||
| MARY SIMMONS | Board Member | — | ||
| JOHN WRIGHT | Board President | — | ||
| TANA GALLAGHER | Treasurer | — | ||
| SUSAN WRIGHT | Secretary | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 5 other orgs in NV with NTEE prefix A5.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 21 points above the peer median (50 vs. 29).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 55 → 38 over 5 years (declining by 17 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.