Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data
Market
Archetype
Mechanical
Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint
Insufficient Data
What does this mean?
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
Institutional Health Scores
Overall
22
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
15
Score
Title
-
Institutions
-
Avg Revenue
-
Risk Profile
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2022 | — | — | 39.7% | 22 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Triza Cox | Board Member | 18.2% of Rev | ||
| Emily Lyon | Artistic Director | 16.0% of Rev | ||
| Michele Danna | Board Member | 8.8% of Rev | ||
| Cori Oster | Board Member | 7.1% of Rev | ||
| Maraika Lumholdt | Marketing Coordinator | 1.5% of Rev | ||
| Kathy Rondon | Secretary | — | ||
| Aubrie Fennecken | Treasurer | — | ||
| Nick Gabriel | Board Of Diretors | — | ||
| Mary Candler Lind | Board President | — | ||
| Gwendolyn Kelso | Board Of Directors | — | ||
| Rob Jones | Board Of Directors | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emily Lyon | Artistic Director | 13.2% of Rev | ||
| Corri Oster | Board Member | 13.2% of Rev | ||
| Shannon Corenthin | Board Member | 13.2% of Rev | ||
| Mary Candler Lind | Board President | — | ||
| Antionette Chukudebelu | Secretary | — | ||
| Rhoundy Jones | Treasurer | — | ||
| Aubrie Fennecken | Board Of Directors | — | ||
| Julia Harper | Board Of Directors | — | ||
| Gwendolyn Anne Kelso | Board Of Directors | — | ||
| Azeez Salami | Board Of Directors | — |
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown
Score breakdown
Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
22 / 100
Priority Review
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 21 points below the peer median (10 vs. 31).
5-year trend: Insufficient Data
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 39.7% is above the 90th percentile for orgs of this size (healthy band: 18–22%).
- Financial resilience score in the bottom quartile — reserves and liabilities ratios warrant review.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Reduce top-officer compensation from 39.7% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~35 points.
- Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.