Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
41
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 41 Fragile Recovery
2022 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 50 Fragile Recovery
2019 40 Fragile Recovery
2018 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEPHAINE CASTEEL Secretary
ERIC DUBOSE Treasurer
JENNIFER FORSBERG Board President
DAVE HERBERT VICE PRESIDE
LEVI PAULEY VICE PRESIDE

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GRANT FOWLER Board President
TAMMI CAMPIS VICE PRESIDE
DEBORAH SIEBENTHAL Secretary
KAREN DANSBY RECORDING SE
STEVE INMAN Treasurer
JENNIFER GREEN Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KRISTINE TROTTIER Board President
MIKE BROWN VICE PRESIDE
LISA SPIVEY Treasurer
TAMMI CAMPIS Treasurer
CLIFTON VANCE RECORDING SE
HEATHER HAMES CORRESPONDIN
GRANT FOWLER Board President
TAMMI CAMPIS VICE PRESIDE
DEBORAH SIEBENTHAL Secretary
KAREN DANSBY RECORDING SE
STEVE INMAN Treasurer
JENNIFER GREEN Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in FL for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.