Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
41
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 27.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 15.7% 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Hollie Pryor Board Member 13.3% of Rev
Stacey Koloski Board Member 8.1% of Rev
Deanna Etienne Board President
Hollye Seddon Board President
Linda Faber-Shields Treasurer
Zoe Lewis Secretary
Shannon Wade Board Member
Ryan LeFebvre Board Member
Hallie Scammell Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Shannon Wade Board Member 12.7% of Rev
Stacey Koloski Board Member 5.1% of Rev
Maria Fox Board President
Elizabeth Bliss Treasurer
Deirdre Fulton McDonough Board President
Hollye Seddon Board Member
Deanna Etienne Secretary
Zoe Lewis Board Member
Benny May Board Member
Hallie Scammell Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Shannon Wade Board Member 10.8% of Rev
Stacey Koloski Board Member 1.4% of Rev
Maria Fox Board President
Elizabeth Bliss Treasurer
Elizabeth Provost Board Member
Deirdre Fulton McDonough Board President
Hollye Seddon Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 29 other orgs in ME with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 5 points below the peer median (30 vs. 35).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.