Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
51
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 1.9% 51 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — 5.2% 52 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 — — 18.6% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 — — 4.6% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 — — 5.6% 54 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LEONA KNOBLOCH Executive Director 5.1% of Rev
NIC NOVACZYK Board President —
KINE TORINUS Board President —
JOHN TORINUS Secretary —
PATRICK O'CONNOR Treasurer —
BILL BUETTNER Board Member —
ERIN BURGESS Board Member —
BOB DAVENPORT Board Member —
DAN DINEEN Board Member —
RICK FOX Board Member —
KATHLEEN MENTER Board Member —
BROOKE NOVACZYK Board Member —
MARY ROZEK Board Member —
JAY TAMEZ Board Member —
BARRY BERTRAM ROTATED OFF BOARD IN 2024 —
JOHN SANCOMB ROTATED OFF BOARD IN 2024 —
TERI MILLIGAN ROTATED OFF BOARD IN 2024 —
CHRISTOPHER YOGERST ROTATED OFF BOARD IN 2024 —
JOE ZAREMBA ROTATED OFF BOARD IN 2024 —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEFFREY POTTS Executive Director 2.6% of Rev
BILL BUETTNER Executive Director 1.7% of Rev
BARRY BERTRAM Board Member —
ERIN BURGESS Board Member —
DAN DINEEN Board Member —
RICK FOX Board Member —
KATHLEEN MENTER Board Member —
TERI MILLIGAN Board Member —
BROOKE NOVACZYK Board Member —
NIC NOVACZYK Board President —
PATRICK O'CONNOR Treasurer —
JOHN SANCOMB Treasurer —
JAY TAMEZ Board Member —
JOHN TORINUS Secretary —
KINE TORINUS Board President —
CHRISTOPHER YOGERST Board Member —
BOB DAVENPORT Board Member —
JOE ZAREMBA Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEFFREY POTTS EXECUTIVE DI 9.4% of Rev
BARRY BERTRAM Board Member —
BILL BUETTNER Board Member —
ERIN BURGESS Board Member —
DAN DINEEN Board Member —
RICK FOX Board Member —
KATHLEEN MENTER Board Member —
TERI MILLIGAN Board Member —
BROOKE ZIEGLER NOVACZYK Board Member —
NIC NOVACZYK Board President —
PATRICK O'CONNOR Treasurer —
JEFF PACKEE Board Member —
JOHN SANCOMB ASSISTANT TR —
JAY TAMEZ Board Member —
JOHN TORINUS Secretary —
KINE TORINUS VICE PRESIDE —
CHRIS WENZEL Board Member —
CHRISTOPHER YOGERST Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEFFREY POTTS EXECUTIVE DI 9.1% of Rev
BARRY BERTRAM Board Member —
BILL BUETTNER Board Member —
ERIN BURGESS Board Member —
DAN DINEEN Board Member —
RICK FOX Board Member —
SHAWN GRAFF Board Member —
KATHLEEN MENTER Board Member —
TERI MILLIGAN Board Member —
NIC NOVACZYK Board President —
PATRICK O'CONNOR Treasurer —
JEFF PACKEE Board Member —
JOHN SANCOMB ASSISTANT TR —
TONNIE SCHMIDT Board Member —
JAY TAMEZ Board Member —
JOHN TORINUS Secretary —
KINE TORINUS VICE PRESIDE —
CHRIS WENZEL Board Member —
CHRISTOPHER YOGERST Board Member —
SHARON ZIEGLER Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 56 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A8.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 55 points above the peer median (60 vs. 5).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.