Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
26
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 25.7% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2023 18.5% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 39.5% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kirsten Oberoi Executive Director 25.7% of Rev
Heather O'Leary Board President
Angela Card Board President
Thomas Kelly Treasurer
Maria Laura Rodriguez Secretary
Kirstin Gray Board Member
Patricia McMullin Board Member
Victor Hebert Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kirsten Oberoi Executive Director 13.9% of Rev
Brandon Lewis Board Member
Katie Walo Board President
Urania Olivadoti Secretary
Thomas Kelly Treasurer
Kelly Bylica Board Member
Kirstin Gray Board Member
Heather O'Leary Board Member
Patricia McMullin Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
26 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in MA for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.