Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
35
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 35 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 50 Fragile Recovery
2021 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 43 Fragile Recovery
2018 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAT SWEENY Board Member
TRUDI HARTER Board Member
MIKE GLENN BOARD MEMEBER
DALLIN KOECHER BOARD MEMBERADMINISTRATOR
RONNIE BISHOP Board Member
CARRIE ZABALDO Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DALLIN KOECHER BOARD MEMBERADMINISTRATOR

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DALLIN KOECHER BOARD MEMBERADMINISTRATOR
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 19 other orgs in UT with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 14 points above the peer median (35 vs. 21).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.