Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
19
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 57.8% 19 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 42.4% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 59.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 45.9% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Logan Verdoorn Artistic Director 29.1% of Rev
Maria Signorelli Board Member 29.1% of Rev
Logan Verdoorn Artistic Director 23.3% of Rev
Maria Signorelli Board Member 14.4% of Rev
Todd Verdoorn Board President
Victoria Signorelli Treasurer
Robyn Cook Secretary
Robert Ragoonanan Board Member
Sarah Meeks Board Member
Todd Verdoorn Board President
Victoria Signorelli Treasurer
Robyn Cook Secretary
Sarah Meeks Board Member
Robert Ragonannan
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
19 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 47 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 36 points below the peer median (0 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 35 → 19 over 5 years (declining by 16 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 57.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.