Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
56
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — 56 Fragile Recovery
2023 Hidden Hidden — 53 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Brenden Elwood Artistic Director —
Kimberly Borum Board President —
Wynter Elwood Treasurer —
Karen Chang Secretary —
Jim Snyder Board Member —
Melissa Carter Board Member —
Alex Otto Board Member —
Chris Clark Board Member —
Mark Bryant Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Brenden Elwood Treasurer 1.1% of Rev
Wynter Elwood Board Member 1.1% of Rev
Wanda Boe Board President 0.6% of Rev
Melisa Carter Board Member 0.6% of Rev
April Davis Secretary —
Ed Benson Board Member —
David Beegle Board Member —
Robin Walbeck-Forrest Artistic Director —
Peter Cook Book Keeper —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
56 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 332 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 28 points above the peer median (80 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.