Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
25
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 18.5% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2023 13.1% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 14.3% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 30.3% 19 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 16.1% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 12.7% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 13.3% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 10.7% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 10.1% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 9.2% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 47 Fragile Recovery
2011 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DODIE RIFE Executive Director 15.7% of Rev
JANIE SUTTON Secretary 1.5% of Rev
SARAH WAGGONER Board Member 0.5% of Rev
MARISA CLARK Board Member 0.3% of Rev
JORDEN GILFEATHER Board Member 0.3% of Rev
PRECIOUS MCKENZIE Board Member 0.3% of Rev
WILLIAM STEARNS Board President
DANIEL STRUCKMAN Board President
KATHY BOILEAU Treasurer
STEVE ZEDIKER Board President
MICHAEL BOILEAU Board Member
KAREN POSTEMA Board Member
CASEY ROTH Board Member
LYNEA WALLACE Board Member
BLAKE SUTTON Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DODIE RIFE MANAGING PRODUCER 13.5% of Rev
KAREN POSTEMA Secretary
WILLIAM STEARNS Board President
ELLEN LAYTON Board President
DANIEL STRUCKMAN Board President
STEVEN BUTLER Treasurer
STEVE ZEDIKER Board Member
JANIE SUTTON Board Member
AMY DIXON Board Member
LUCINDA BUTLER Board President
DELANEY HARDY RAY Board Member
LYNSEY ROSS LUND Board Member
PRECIOUS MCKENZIE Board Member
BEN MEYER Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DODIE RIFE MANAGING PRODUCER 13.5% of Rev
STEVEN BUTLER Treasurer
KAREN POSTEMA Secretary
JENNIFER CHAPMAN Board Member
DOUGLAS NAGEL Board President
DANIEL STRUCKMAN Board President
LUCINDA BUTLER Board President
BEN MEYER Board Member
ELLEN LAYTON Board Member
PRECIOUS MCKENZIE Board Member
LYNSEY ROSS Board Member
SARAH KARY Board Member
WILLIAM STEARNS Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DODIE RIFE MANAGING PRODUCER 12.4% of Rev
STEVEN BUTLER Board President
KAREN POSTEMA Secretary
JENNIFER CHAPMAN Board President
DOUGLAS NAGEL Board Member
DANIEL STRUCKMAN Board Member
REBEKAH RAE Board Member
LUCINDA BUTLER Board President
KARLA STRICKER Treasurer
BEN MEYER Board Member
KAREN STEARS Board Member
ROBERT STEARS Board Member
ELLEN LAYTON Board Member
PRECIOUS MCKENZIE Board Member
SHANNON JOHNSON Board Member
LYNSEY ROSS LUND Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
25 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 16 other orgs in MT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 38 points below the peer median (0 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.