Governance Lag
Governance Lag
Governance Lag Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Governance Lag

What does this mean?

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

The Path Forward

The Scaffold

Brings immediate structural maturity. It represents the necessity of outside, independent oversight to manage new scale, breaking the echo chamber of a founding 'friends and family' board.

The Scaffold
The Scaffold
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Governance Lag
Overall
42
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Governance Lag

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 22.6% 42 Fragile Gov Risk
2023 43 Fragile Recovery
2021 23 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 24.7% 39 Fragile Recovery
2019 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 43 Fragile Recovery
2016 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 21 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Emily Wolfram Executive Director 22.6% of Rev
Thomas Webster Board President
Jill Dostert Wagner Board President
Connie Jenkins Treasurer
Gary Fjeldstad Board Member
Jim Peaco Board Member
Rob Kohler Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Emily Wolfram Executive Director 20.8% of Rev
Thomas Webster Board President
Jill Dostert Wagner Board President
Connie Jenkins Treasurer
Misty Annala Secretary
Hannah Hudgins Board Member
John Zirkle Board Member
Jim Peaco Board Member
Nick Spear Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Keern Haslem Executive Director 20.8% of Rev
Tom Webster Board President
Jill Dostert-Wagner Board President
Connie Jenkins Secretary
Larry Gomoll Treasurer
Alyssa Roggow Artist Representative
John Zirkle Board Member
Jim Peaco Board Member
Misty Annala Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
42 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 5 other orgs in MT with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 17 points above the peer median (55 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Governance Lag

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Reduce top-officer compensation from 22.6% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~5 points.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.