Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
27
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 16.1% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 — — 19.4% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 14.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 — — 12.3% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARA HANEL Executive Director 17.3% of Rev
KARLACE TAYLOR CHAIRMAN —
WADE BENSON VICE CHAIRMAN —
STEPHENIE ANDERSON Treasurer —
MARY ANN LAXEN Secretary —
MARY BETH KING Board Member —
DEB ALEXANDER Board Member —
JOHN COVLIN Board Member —
KAITLIN BARBOSA Board Member —
MARIA HAMMER Board Member —
CARLA ARNDT Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARA HANEL Executive Director 16.0% of Rev
KARLACE TAYLOR CHAIRMAN —
JAIMIE SNOWDON VICE CHAIRMAN —
EMILY KUZEL Treasurer —
STEPHENIE ANDERSON Secretary —
THERESE JACOBSON Board Member —
KATE MULVEY Board Member —
MARY ANN LAXEN Board Member —
SANDY SEREGIN Board Member —
RENA BOUCHARD Board Member —
WADE BENSON Board Member —
MARY BETH KING Board Member —
DEB ALEXANDER Board Member —
JOHN COVLIN Board Member —
KAITLIN BARBOSA Board Member —
MARIA HAMMER Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARA HANEL Executive Director 12.5% of Rev
PAUL BURNETT Board Member —
EMILY KUZEL Secretary —
CHRIS LANE Treasurer —
THERESE JACOBSON Board Member —
KATYA ZEPEDA Board Member —
KATE MULVERY Board President —
BRIANA INGRAHAM Board President —
MARY BETH KING Board Member —
JAIMIE SNOWDON Board President —
DEB ALEXANDER Board Member —
RENA BOUCHARD Board Member —
KARLACE TAYLOR Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARA HANEL Executive Director 10.3% of Rev
PAUL BURNETT Board Member —
EMILY KUZEL Board Member —
ELWYN RUUD Board Member —
CHRIS LANE Treasurer —
SCOTT VALDES Board Member —
THERESE JACOBSON Board Member —
KATYA ZEPEDA Board President —
KATE MULVERY Secretary —
JANET JOHNSON Board Member —
BRIANA INGRAHAM Board President —
CHARLES ERICKSON Board Member —
JAIMIE SNOWDON Board Member —
DEB ALEXANDER Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
27 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 169 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 68 points below the peer median (0 vs. 68).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.