Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
27
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 16.1% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 19.4% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 14.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 12.3% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARA HANEL Executive Director 17.3% of Rev
KARLACE TAYLOR CHAIRMAN
WADE BENSON VICE CHAIRMAN
STEPHENIE ANDERSON Treasurer
MARY ANN LAXEN Secretary
MARY BETH KING Board Member
DEB ALEXANDER Board Member
JOHN COVLIN Board Member
KAITLIN BARBOSA Board Member
MARIA HAMMER Board Member
CARLA ARNDT Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARA HANEL Executive Director 16.0% of Rev
KARLACE TAYLOR CHAIRMAN
JAIMIE SNOWDON VICE CHAIRMAN
EMILY KUZEL Treasurer
STEPHENIE ANDERSON Secretary
THERESE JACOBSON Board Member
KATE MULVEY Board Member
MARY ANN LAXEN Board Member
SANDY SEREGIN Board Member
RENA BOUCHARD Board Member
WADE BENSON Board Member
MARY BETH KING Board Member
DEB ALEXANDER Board Member
JOHN COVLIN Board Member
KAITLIN BARBOSA Board Member
MARIA HAMMER Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARA HANEL Executive Director 12.5% of Rev
PAUL BURNETT Board Member
EMILY KUZEL Secretary
CHRIS LANE Treasurer
THERESE JACOBSON Board Member
KATYA ZEPEDA Board Member
KATE MULVERY Board President
BRIANA INGRAHAM Board President
MARY BETH KING Board Member
JAIMIE SNOWDON Board President
DEB ALEXANDER Board Member
RENA BOUCHARD Board Member
KARLACE TAYLOR Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARA HANEL Executive Director 10.3% of Rev
PAUL BURNETT Board Member
EMILY KUZEL Board Member
ELWYN RUUD Board Member
CHRIS LANE Treasurer
SCOTT VALDES Board Member
THERESE JACOBSON Board Member
KATYA ZEPEDA Board President
KATE MULVERY Secretary
JANET JOHNSON Board Member
BRIANA INGRAHAM Board President
CHARLES ERICKSON Board Member
JAIMIE SNOWDON Board Member
DEB ALEXANDER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
27 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 47 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 36 points below the peer median (0 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.