Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 7.8% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 7.8% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 2.5% 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 6.6% 44 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 4.0% 45 Fragile Recovery
2018 8.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 8.1% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 10.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 5.0% 39 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 5.2% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2013 5.4% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jason Eagan Foun Art Dir 3.7% of Rev
Renee Blinkwolt Executive Dir. 3.3% of Rev
Jenny Steingart Board President
Dana Kirchman Board President
Jason Kemper Treasurer
Judy Bedol Secretary
Rich Battista Board Member
Nancy Pritzker Bergman Board Member
Nicole Brodeur Board Member
Greg Corradetti Board Member
Victor Edozien Board Member
Rick Feldman Board Member
Mei Lin Kwan-Gett Board Member
Greta Mansour Board Member
David Miner Board Member
Doug Rappaport Board Member
Stephen Siderow Board Member
Alisa Lessing Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JASON EAGAN Artistic Director 3.9% of Rev
RENEE BLINKWOLT Board Member 3.2% of Rev
ALISA LESSING Board President
JENNIFER STEINGART Board President
DANA KIRCHMAN Board President
JASON KEMPER Treasurer
JUDY BEDOL Secretary
RICH BATTISTA Board Member
NANCY PRITZKER BERGMAN Board Member
NICOLE BRODEUR Board Member
GREG CORRADETTI Board Member
VICTOR EDOZIEN Board Member
RICK FELDMAN Board Member
DEEKSHA GAUR Board Member
MEI LIN KWAN-GETT Board Member
GRETA MANSOUR Board Member
DOUG RAPPAPORT Board Member
STEPHEN SIDEROW Board Member
DAVID MINER Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JASON EAGAN Artistic Director 2.9% of Rev
RENEE BLINKWOLT Board Member 2.9% of Rev
ALISA LESSING Board President
JENNIFER STEINGART Board President
DANA KIRCHMAN Board President
JASON KEMPER Treasurer
JUDY BEDOL Secretary
RICH BATTISTA Board Member
NANCY PRITZKER BERGMAN Board Member
NICOLE BRODEUR Board Member
GREG CORRADETTI Board Member
VICTOR EDOZIEN Board Member
RICK FELDMAN Board Member
LIZZY FLORENCE Board Member
DEEKSHA GAUR Board Member
MEI LIN KWAN-GETT Board Member
GRETA MANSOUR Board Member
DOUG RAPPAPORT Board Member
STEPHEN SIDEROW Board Member
DAVID MINER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

Overall score has gone from 45 → 50 over 5 years (improving by 5 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.