Mission Drift
What does this mean?
Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.
The Path Forward
The Lodestar
A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | — | — | 5.0% | 54 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 55 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 58 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 37 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 55 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 55 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 55 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2013 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 43 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2011 | — | — | — | 25 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DARIUS POLIKAITIS | Board Member | 4.9% of Rev | ||
| GITANA LEVANIENE | Treasurer | — | ||
| KRISTINA MAZILIAUSKIENE | Secretary | — | ||
| DARIUS CEPULIS | Board Member | — | ||
| LINA ZLIOBA | Board Member | — | ||
| ANDRIUS TAMULIS | Board Member | — | ||
| AUDRIUS ALEKSIUNAS | Board Member | — | ||
| VINCENT STANISKIS | Board President | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VINCENT STANISKIS | Board President | — | ||
| DARIUS POLIKAITIS | Board Member | — | ||
| GITANA LEVANIENE | Treasurer | — | ||
| AIDA GUST | Secretary | — | ||
| MONIKA DOBROVOLSKYTE | Board Member | — | ||
| LINA ZLIOBA | Board Member | — | ||
| ANDRIUS TAMULIS | Board Member | — | ||
| GIEDRE DIRZIENE | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 195 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 40 points above the peer median (75 vs. 35).
5-year trend: Mission Drift
Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.
Overall score has gone from 55 → 54 over 5 years (declining by 1 points).
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 5.0% sits within the sector's healthy band (18–22%).
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.