Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
32
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2023 45 Fragile Recovery
2022 40 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 42 Fragile Recovery
2020 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 35 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lindsay Lanier Treasurer
CHANTELLE CASTLE Board President
JEN FOSTER Board President
SABRINA BROWN Board President
TRISHA FYFE Board President
JAMIE HERBERT Board President
MARISSA MATHESON Secretary
AILEEN KLUTH Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MEGAN BRUNING Board President
MATTHEW PULSIPHER Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MEGAN BRUNING Board President
MATTHEW PULSIPHER Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MEGAN BRUNING Board President
MATTHEW PULSIPHER Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
32 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in WA for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.