Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
44
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 51 Fragile Recovery
2020 45 Fragile Recovery
2019 43 Fragile Recovery
2018 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 42 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CYNTHIA VILLA Secretary 12.0% of Rev
JESSICA DARIN Board Member 10.9% of Rev
PHILIP WILLIAMS Board Member 9.4% of Rev
CODY VAN DORN CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 8.7% of Rev
DAN BANFIELD Board Member 7.4% of Rev
JOSH MACHAMER Board Member 5.5% of Rev
CHRISTOPHER MILLER Board Member 5.4% of Rev
WILLIAM SPILLER Board Member 4.2% of Rev
MOLLY CLARK Board Member 2.7% of Rev
ZACHARY SMITH Board Member 0.2% of Rev
DEREK JOHNSON Board President
JOEY LESLIE Board President
TRUDIE SAFRENO Board Member
ERICA STEWART Board Member
JILL ANDERSON Board Member
CARLYN CHRISTIANSON Board Member
GREG HERMANN Board Member
MIKE MCCORMICK Board Member
MARYELLEN SIMKINS Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CYNTHIA VILLA Secretary 12.0% of Rev
JESSICA DARIN Board Member 10.2% of Rev
PHILIP WILLIAMS Board Member 9.4% of Rev
LORLIE LEETHAM CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (PART YEAR) 8.1% of Rev
DAN BANFIELD Board Member 7.1% of Rev
CODY VAN DORN CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 6.8% of Rev
CHRISTOPHER MILLER Board Member 5.8% of Rev
ADAM JARMAN Board Member 5.6% of Rev
STEVE LERIAN Board Member 5.2% of Rev
JOSH MACHAMER Board Member 5.0% of Rev
WILLIAM SPILLER Board Member 4.4% of Rev
DEREK JOHNSON Board President
JOEY LESLIE Board President
HEIDI HARMON Board Member
TRUDIE SAFRENO Board Member
SKYE CHRISTAKOS Board Member
GREG HERMANN Board Member
MARYELLEN SIMKINS Board Member
ERICA STEWART Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CYNTHIA VILLA Secretary 11.7% of Rev
JUANITA HOLLER Board Member 9.7% of Rev
JESSICA DARIN Board Member 8.6% of Rev
LORLIE LEETHAM CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 8.0% of Rev
ADAM JARMAN Board Member 6.7% of Rev
DAN BANFIELD Board Member 6.5% of Rev
CHRISTOPHER MILLER Board Member 5.8% of Rev
STEVE LERIAN Board Member 5.1% of Rev
WILLIAM SPILLER Board Member 5.0% of Rev
JOSH MACHAMER Board Member 5.0% of Rev
PHILIP WILLIAMS Board Member 3.4% of Rev
DEREK JOHNSON Board President
TRUDIE SAFRENO Board President
HEIDI HARMON Board Member
JOHN ROLPH Board Member
SKYE CHRISTAKOS Board Member
GREG HERMANN Board Member
JOEY LESLIE Board Member
ANDY PEASE Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 46 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A1.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 43 → 44 over 5 years (improving by 1 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.