Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
32
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2022 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2021 8.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2019 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 5.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NATALIA STANEVA Executive Director 5.4% of Rev
PAUL FINKEL MD Board President
JOHN SHWOPE Board President
ANTHONY VASQUEZ Treasurer
GARY WARTIK Secretary
ERIN POHL Board Member
RUSSELL SPOTO MD Board Member
MARIJANE UNTER Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NATALIA STANEVA Executive Director 5.4% of Rev
BOB LUGARI Board President
KIM WOODS IMMEDIATE PA
HARRY CRONER Treasurer
ANNE PROKOPOVYCH ASST TREASUR
SAMUEL BRUTTOMESSO MD Secretary
JOANNE CHAO Board Member
PAUL FINKEL MD Board Member
NANCY ISRAEL Board Member
KATHY JEFFERS-VOLK Board Member
JAMES NAGY Board Member
BRIAN NELSON Board Member
JOAN PICCIONI Board Member
ERIN POHL Board Member
SHEILA SCHWEDES Board Member
JOHN SHWOPE Board Member
RUSSELL SPOTO MD Board Member
STAN SUTTON Board Member
MARIJANE UNTER Board Member
GARY WARTIK Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SAMUEL BRUTTOMESSO MD Secretary
NANCY ISRAEL Board Member
STEPHEN MACINTOSH Board Member
HARRY CRONER Treasurer
THOMAS MURPHY Board Member
JOANNE CHAO Board Member
ROSS GOLDBERG Board Member
JAMES NAGY Board Member
JOHN SHWOPE Board Member
RUSSELL SPOTO MD Board Member
STAN SUTTON Board Member
PETER VAN NAME Board Member
GARY WARTIK Board Member
KIM WOODS Board Member
LYNN ZIMAN Board Member
PAUL FINKEL MD Board Member
DWIGHT BROWN Chairman
KAREN DEAN FRITTS PhD Board Member
BOB LUGARI Board President
BRIAN NELSON Board Member
JOAN PICCIONI Board Member
ERIN POHL Board Member
ANNE PROKOPOVYCH Board Member
MARYJANE UNTER Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LEAH MENDELSOHN Board Member
SAMUEL BRUTTOMESSO MD Secretary
NANCY ISRAEL Board Member
STEPHEN MACINTOSH Board Member
HARRY CRONER Treasurer
THOMAS MURPHY Board Member
JOANNE CHAO Board Member
ROSS GOLDBERG Board President
JAMES NAGY Board Member
JOHN SHWOPE Board Member
RUSSELL SPOTO MD Board Member
STAN SUTTON Board Member
PETER VAN NAME Board Member
GARY WARTIK Board Member
KIM WOODS Board Member
LYNN ZIMAN Board Member
PAUL FINKEL MD Board Member
DWIGHT BROWN Chairman
MARK FITZPATRICK Board Member
KAREN DEAN FRITTS PhD Board Member
BOB LUGARI Board President
BRIAN NELSON Board Member
JOAN PICCIONI Board Member
ERIN POHL Board Member
ANNE PROKOPOVYCH Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
32 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 33 points below the peer median (0 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.