Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
48
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 48 Fragile Recovery
2023 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 46 Fragile Recovery
2021 43 Fragile Recovery
2020 48 Fragile Recovery
2018 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 51 Fragile Recovery
2015 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 45 Fragile Recovery
2012 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Miki Hirabayashi-Bellon Board Member
Reiko Iwanaga Board Member
LaDonna Yumori Kaku Board Member
Neil Kozuma Board Member
Mark Young Board Member
Cheryl James Board Member
Audrey Munnerlyn Board Member
Leainne Wong Lamb Board President
Cindy Toy Board President
Joanne Ho Treasurer
Caroline Kondo Moore Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CINDY TOY Board President
JOANNE HO Treasurer
LEIANNE LAMB Board President
LA DONNA YUMORI-KAKU Secretary
REIKO IWANAGA Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LA DONNA YUMORI-KAKU Secretary
REIKO IWANAGA Secretary
CINDY TOY Board President
JOANNE HO Treasurer
LEIANNE LAMB Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 17 points above the peer median (50 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.