Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
42
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 42 Fragile Recovery
2022 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 36 Fragile Recovery
2020 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 42 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PHILIP MORRIS Board Member
JUDY HEARN Board Member
CAROL HOUCHENS ADVISORS TO THE BOARD
ROBERT DICKERSON ADVISORS TO THE BOARD
PHILIP HAMER Board Member
NORMAN HARDY Board Member
PHILIP F SINCO Board Member
KRISTEN LAGRANGE Board Member
JASON FRANCIA Board Member
NATALIE GUY Board Member
THOMAS V APKARIAN JR CPA Treasurer
LESLIE MOSSON Secretary
SANDRA DICKERSON Board President
CLIFF SOLOMON Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SANDRA DICKERSON Board Member
PHILIP MORRIS Board Member
JUDY HEARN Board Member
CAROL HOUCHENS ADVISORS TO THE BOARD
ROBERT DICKERSON ADVISORS TO THE BOARD
DAN WOODSON Board Member
JESSICA M COLLIER Board Member
CLIFF SOLOMON Board Member
THOMAS V APKARIAN JR CPA Treasurer
LESLIE MOSSON Secretary
JED BEEBE Board President
EILEEN HERVEY Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SANDRA DICKERSON Board Member
PHILIP MORRIS Board Member
JUDY HEARN Board Member
CAROL HOUCHENS ADVISORS TO THE BOARD
ROBERT DICKERSON ADVISORS TO THE BOARD
DAN WOODSON Board Member
JESSICA M COLLIER Board Member
CLIFF SOLOMON Board Member
THOMAS V APKARIAN JR CPA Treasurer
LESLIE MOSSON Secretary
JED BEEBE Board President
EILEEN HERVEY Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DIANE BORAD-MIRKEN Board Member
PHILIP MORRIS Board Member
DR INGRID KOVACS Board Member
JUDY HEARN Board Member
EILEEN HERVEY Board President
CAROL HOUCHENS ADVISORS TO THE BOARD
DR LYNNE GARRETT ADVISORS TO THE BOARD
TIMMIE DONATI Board Member
JESSICA M COLLIER Board Member
LESLIE MOSSON Board Member
THOMAS V APKARIAN JR CPA Treasurer
LINDA BARTH Secretary
JED BEEBE Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
42 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 6 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix Z9.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 9 points above the peer median (25 vs. 16).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.