Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
51
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 51 Fragile Recovery
2023 47 Fragile Recovery
2022 40 Fragile Recovery
2020 57 Fragile Recovery
2019 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 51 Fragile Recovery
2016 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lee Actor Board Member 2.9% of Rev
Mercedes Gimeno-Segovia Board Member 1.6% of Rev
Nat Collins Board President
Kyle Adler Secretary
Geri Actor Board Member
Natalie Haworth-Liu Board Member
Annette Grot Board Member
Lucas Tejwani Board Member
Don Gunaratne Board Member
Stefan Gerhard Treasurer
Grant Anderson Board Member
Nat Collins Board President
Kyle Adlier Secretary
Geri Actor Board Member
Lee Actor Direcotr
Natalie Hayworth-Liu Board Member
Annette Grot Board Member
Don Gunaratne Direcotr
Karmen Peng Treasurer
Grant Anderson Board Member
David Allen Board Member
Lily Tian Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 42 points above the peer median (75 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 53 → 51 over 5 years (declining by 2 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.