Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 13.6% 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 3.0% 55 Fragile Recovery
2021 22.6% 40 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 16.6% 43 Fragile Recovery
2019 19.4% 37 Fragile Recovery
2018 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 35 Fragile Recovery
2015 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 35 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 47 Fragile Recovery
2012 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2010 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VALERIA MIRANDA Executive Dir. 12.8% of Rev
TRINA COFFMAN-GOMEZ Treasurer
JESSICA CARRASCO Secretary
OME GARCIA Board President
MONIQUE SANCHEZ Secretary
ANA PAULA PRADO TEEPLE Board Member
SHIRLEY FLORES-MUNOZ Board Member
ADRIANA TORRES Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LINDA MARTIN Executive Dir. 12.2% of Rev
JUDY STABILE Treasurer
MARY COMFORT Secretary
AURELIO GONZALEZ Board President
TRINA COFFMAN-GOMEZ Board Member
SHIRLEY FLORES-MUNOZ Board Member
ADRIENNE MOMI Board President
OME GARCIA Secretary
BETH SHIELDS Board Member
ANA PAULA PRADO TEEPLE Board President
GABRIEL MEDINA Board Member
JESSICA CARRASCO Board Member
MONIQUE SANCHEZ Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 14 points above the peer median (45 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 37 → 45 over 5 years (improving by 8 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.