Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
39
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 39 Fragile Gov Risk
2023 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 9.2% 50 Fragile Recovery
2021 53 Fragile Recovery
2020 58 Fragile Recovery
2019 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 53 Fragile Recovery
2016 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 53 Fragile Recovery
2014 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CATHERINE C TRAVER Executive Director 12.0% of Rev
DR MARK HOLLINSWORTH Board President
STEVE SALZMAN Treasurer
DR FOREST MAHAN Board President
JAMES MOORE Board President
MEREDITH BOYLAN Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CATHERINE C TRAVER Executive Director 11.0% of Rev
ANTHONY J ATECA Board President
STEVE SALZMAN Treasurer
DR FOREST MAHAN Board President
DENNIS DUERKSEN Board President
KERRY DUNN Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANTHONY J ATECA Board President
STEVE SALZMAN Treasurer
DR FOREST MAHAN Board President
CATHERINE C TRAVER Executive Director
DENNIS DUERKSEN Board President
BONNIE KELLY Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 97 other orgs in SC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 17 points above the peer median (45 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.