Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
32
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
20
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Elizabeth Miller Board President
Kathryn Mitchell Board President
Kate Ferguson Vice President
Johanna Morrow Vice President
Angela Childress Board President
Jennifer Fraser Board President
LuAnn Madison Vice President
Paula Findley Vice President
Jennifer Smothermon Vice President
Kathryn Mitchell Secretary
Karla McCall Treasurer
Kathryn Mitchell Parliamentarian
Amos Davis Board Member
Tiffany Lamb Board Member
Kelley Messer Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Elizabeth Miller Board President
Kathryn Mitchell Board President
Kate Ferguson Vice President
Johanna Morrow Vice President
Angela Childress Board President
Jennifer Fraser Board President
LuAnn Madison Vice President
Paula Findley Vice President
Jennifer Smothermon Vice President
Kathryn Mitchell Secretary
Karla McCall Treasurer
Kathryn Mitchell Parliamentarian
Amos Davis Board Member
Tiffany Lamb Board Member
Kelley Messer Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Amos Davis Board President
Elizabeth Miller Board President
Kathryn Mitchell Board President
Elizabeth Miller Board President
Kim Melnyk Board President
Della Beasley Board President
Jana Hancock Board President
Stephanie Johnson Board President
Paula Findley Board President
Jana Hancock Secretary
Karla McCall Treasurer
Jennifer Smotherman Board Member
Tammy Robinson Board Member
Susie Rockett Board Member
Donna Thorne Parliamentarian
Tiffany Lamb Board President
Amos Davis Board President
Kathryn Mitchell Board President
Angela Childress Board President
Pebbles Lee Board President
Amanda Biles Board President
Jana Hancock Board President
Tamara Long Board President
Stephanie Johnson Board President
Jessica Melson Secretary
Laury Tarver Treasurer
Jennifer Smotherman Board Member
Elizabeth Miller Board Member
Jennifer Shultz Board Member
Judy Voelter Parliamentarian
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
20 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
32 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 133 other orgs in TX with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 18 points below the peer median (15 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.