Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
23
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 — — — 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2023 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 — — — 26 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 — — — 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — — 38 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sally Schaefer Board Member —
Dee D Miller Board Member —
Joe Tubiolo Board Member —
Jeff Schaub Board Member —
Matilda J Kraemer Board Member —
Howard Friedman Board Member —
Benjamin Gilbert Board Member —
Elvia Thompson Board President —
Diane Nichols Board President —
Diane Hornyak Treasurer —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sally Schaefer Board Member —
Jane Kraemer Board Member —
Michael Kelley Board Member —
Jeff Schaub Board Member —
Ronnie Koch Board President —
Jack Evans Board President —
Paul Ebner Treasurer —
Diane Nichols Secretary —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
23 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 163 other orgs in MD with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 53 points below the peer median (5 vs. 58).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 38 → 23 over 5 years (declining by 15 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.