Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
54
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 8.4% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 2.7% 55 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 7.7% 58 Fragile Recovery
2020 5.8% 52 Fragile Recovery
2019 46 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 11.0% 46 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 8.7% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 9.3% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 2.6% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 1.1% 55 Fragile Recovery
2013 10.9% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 14.4% 48 Fragile Recovery
2011 30.1% 42 Fragile Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARK MEISTER Board President 8.9% of Rev
MICHELLE MASSEY DIR OF PUBLIC PROGRAMS & MARKETING 5.9% of Rev
CHUCK RITCHIE Board President
FIROU MOSTASHARI Board Member
GWENN DJUPEDAL Board Member
JAMES MILLER Board Member
JAN DEL CALZO Board Member
KATHY BRACKEN Secretary
LIZ PETRANGELO Board Member
MARK DOWNEY Treasurer
NORLIN BOYUM Board Member
PER HONG Board Member
ROMA CALAYATUD-STOCKS Board Member
SEAN KALAFUT Board Member
STEVE MAURER Board President
LUDMILA BORISNOVA EKLUND Board Member
KELLEY LINDQUIST Board Member
C BEN WRIGHT Board Member
BRIANA CLARK Board Member
MARLENA MYLES Board Member
LINDA SHELTON Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARK J MEISTER Executive Director 7.8% of Rev
CHUCK RITCHIE Board President
DAVID WASHBURN Board Member
FIROU MOSTASHARI Board Member
GWENN DJUPEDAL Board Member
JAMES MILLER Board Member
JAN DEL CALZO Board Member
KATHY BRACKEN Secretary
LIZ PETRANGELO Board President
MARK DOWNEY Treasurer
NORLIN BOYUM Board Member
PER HONG Board Member
REGGIE BOYLE Board Member
ROMA CALAYATUD-STOCKS Board Member
SEAN KALAFUT Board Member
STEVE MAURER Board Member
LUDMILA BORISNOVA EKLUND Board Member
KELLEY LINDQUIST Board Member
MEAGHAN SHOMION Board Member
C BEN WRIGHT Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARK J MEISTER Executive Director 7.2% of Rev
CHRISTINE PODAS-LARSON Board Member
CHUCK RITCHIE Board Member
DAVID WASHBURN Board Member
DR C BEN WRIGHT Board Member
NORLIN BOYUM Board Member
KATHY BRACKEN Secretary
LIZ PETRANGELO Board President
MARK DOWNEY Treasurer
NATALIA BERGLUND Board Member
REGGIE BOYLE Board President
ROMA CALAYATUD-STOCKS Board Member
JAN DEL CALZO Board Member
GWENN DJUPEDAL Board Member
DR LUDMILA BORISNOVA EKLUND Board Member
PER HONG Board Member
SEAN KALAFUT Board Member
STEVE MAURER Board Member
JAMES MILLER Board Member
FIROU MOSTASHARI Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARK J MEISTER Executive Director 7.1% of Rev
CHRISTINE PODAS-LARSON Board President
DAVID WASHBURN Board Member
CHUCK RITCHIE Board Member
DR C BEN WRIGHT Board Member
JULIE SNOW Board Member
LIZ PETRANGELO Board President
KATHY BRACKEN Board Member
MARK DOWNEY Board Member
NATALIA BERGLUND Board Member
REGGIE BOYLE Secretary
STEVEN HEIM Treasurer
THEOFANIS STAVROU PHD Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 6 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 18 points above the peer median (50 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.