Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 47 Fragile Recovery
2022 38.0% 52 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2021 37.9% 48 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 100.9% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 43 Fragile Recovery
2018 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 37 Fragile Recovery
2016 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 37 Fragile Recovery
2012 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 37 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELDAR VALIEV Artistic Director 37.7% of Rev
CHRISTINA COST Board President
ELDAR VALIEV Board President
ASHLEY ODOM Secretary
MELISSA SIMS Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELDAR VALIEV Artistic Director 37.7% of Rev
CHRISTINA COST Board President
ELDAR VALIEV Board President
ASHLEY ODOM Secretary
MELISSA SIMS Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELDAR VALIEV Artistic Director 37.7% of Rev
CHRISTINA COST Board President
ELDAR VALIEV Board President
ASHLEY ODOM Secretary
MELISSA SIMS Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 132 other orgs in TX with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 24 points above the peer median (55 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

Overall score has gone from 43 → 47 over 5 years (improving by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.