Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↓
Overall
26
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2022 — — 29.8% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — — 37 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 25.3% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — — 43 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — — 45 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — — 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 — — — 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — — 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — — 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARAH JONES Executive Dir. 12.4% of Rev
CHRIS VAUGHT Board Member —
GABRIEL SALGADO Board President —
JIM CAMP Secretary —
LIZETTE RODRIGUEZ Board Member —
KATIE OSUAMPKE Treasurer —
LUANN LANE Board Member —
DR PATRICIA HUGHES Board Member —
JOSE SOSA Board Member —
LAURA URQUIETA Board Member —
JACLYN WOOLF Board Member —
DR KATIE OSUAMKPE Board President —
DR PATRICIA HUGHES Board President —
JIM CAMP Secretary —
LUANN LANE Board Member —
MARK WATT Treasurer —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARAH JONES Executive Dir. 29.8% of Rev
CHRIS VAUGHT Board Member —
GABRIEL SALGADO Board President —
JIM CAMP Secretary —
LIZETTE RODRIGUEZ Board Member —
KATIE OSUAMPKE Treasurer —
LUANN LANE Board Member —
VIVIAN MOSS Board Member —
DR PATRICIA HUGHES Board Member —
JOSE SOSA Board Member —
LAURA URQUIETA Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARAH JONES Executive Dir. 17.1% of Rev
CHRIS VAUGHT Board Member —
GABRIEL SALGADO Board President —
GAYLE BANSCHBACH Board Member —
JIM CAMP Secretary —
LIZETTE RODRIGUEZ Board President —
LOVE SWIMMING BEAR Board Member —
LUANN LANE Board Member —
PEGGY JONES Board Member —
VIVIAN MOSS Board Member —
DR PATRICIA HUGHES Board Member —
JOSE SOSA Treasurer —
RACHEL RITTER Board Member —
LAURA URQUIETA Board Member —
DR MELISSA GRAHAM HANSEN Board Member —
TIFFANY MOORE Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
26 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 483 other orgs in TX with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 57 points below the peer median (10 vs. 67).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 29.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~16 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.