Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

"Ballet San Angelo fosters creativity, self-esteem, and discipline through high-quality dance training and productions, actively reducing barriers to involvement and providing free community programs."

— Statement of Program Service Accomplishments

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward

Demonstrated Impact

  • Artistic productions benefited over 6,105 individuals
  • Community fitness classes benefited over 7,441 individuals
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↓
Overall
42
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 12.3% 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 — — 11.1% 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — 12.6% 39 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 15.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 4.3% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — 13.5% 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — 5.6% 44 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 17.7% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 19.3% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 — — — 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ERIN LANE EXECUTIVE DIRCTOR 13.7% of Rev
TRENTON PRIDDY Board President —
BAYLIE BECKWITH Board President —
BAILEY BEAVERS Treasurer —
JORDAN SEFCIK Secretary —
CONNIE KELLY Board President —
NICK ELLIS Board Member —
LAURA ADAMS Board Member —
CATHRYN GOLDEN Board Member —
FARRAH GOMEZ Board Member —
TRINA DELGADO Board Member —
CLAY LOPER Board Member —
LYLA MARTINEZ Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ERIN LANE EXECUTIVE DIRCTOR 12.3% of Rev
CONNIE KELLY Board President —
TRENTON PRIDDY Board President —
BAYLIE BECKWITH Treasurer —
ANDY TIGER Secretary —
JASON BRAKE Board President —
BAILEY BEAVERS Board Member —
LAURA ADAMS Board Member —
MARISSA GIESECKE Board Member —
FARRAH GOMEZ Board Member —
TRINA DELGADO Board Member —
ARIELLE PLESANT Board Member —
NICK ELLIS Board Member —
ABIGAIL KETCHUM Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ERIN LANE Executive Director 10.4% of Rev
JASON BRAKE Board President —
CONSTANCE KELLEY Treasurer —
MARK LACK Secretary —
SANDY SEIFERT Board President —
PATSY CLEERE Board Member —
NICK ELLIS Board Member —
JODY GENTRY Board Member —
MARISSA GIESECKE Board Member —
FARRAH GOMEZ Board Member —
ARIELLE PLESANT Board Member —
TRENTON PRIDDY Board Member —
EZRA RAMIREZ Board Member —
ANDY TIGER Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ERIN LANE Executive Director 10.5% of Rev
JASON BRAKE Board President —
CONSTANCE KELLEY Treasurer —
MARK LACK Secretary —
SANDY SEIFERT Board President —
MARISSA GIESECKE Board Member —
JODY GENTRY Board Member —
WHITNEY WATSON WOOD Board Member —
FARRAH GOMEZ Board Member —
EZRA RAMIREZ Board Member —
PATSY CLEERE Board Member —
NICK ELLIS Board Member —
ARIELLE PLEASANT Board Member —
TRENTON PRIDDY Board Member —
ANDY TIGER Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
42 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 484 other orgs in TX with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 42 points below the peer median (25 vs. 67).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.