Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

"Ballet San Angelo fosters creativity, self-esteem, and discipline through high-quality dance training and productions, actively reducing barriers to involvement and providing free community programs."

— Statement of Program Service Accomplishments

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward

Demonstrated Impact

  • Artistic productions benefited over 6,105 individuals
  • Community fitness classes benefited over 7,441 individuals
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
42
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 12.3% 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 11.1% 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 12.6% 39 Fragile Recovery
2020 15.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 4.3% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 13.5% 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 5.6% 44 Fragile Recovery
2016 17.7% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 19.3% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ERIN LANE EXECUTIVE DIRCTOR 13.7% of Rev
TRENTON PRIDDY Board President
BAYLIE BECKWITH Board President
BAILEY BEAVERS Treasurer
JORDAN SEFCIK Secretary
CONNIE KELLY Board President
NICK ELLIS Board Member
LAURA ADAMS Board Member
CATHRYN GOLDEN Board Member
FARRAH GOMEZ Board Member
TRINA DELGADO Board Member
CLAY LOPER Board Member
LYLA MARTINEZ Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ERIN LANE EXECUTIVE DIRCTOR 12.3% of Rev
CONNIE KELLY Board President
TRENTON PRIDDY Board President
BAYLIE BECKWITH Treasurer
ANDY TIGER Secretary
JASON BRAKE Board President
BAILEY BEAVERS Board Member
LAURA ADAMS Board Member
MARISSA GIESECKE Board Member
FARRAH GOMEZ Board Member
TRINA DELGADO Board Member
ARIELLE PLESANT Board Member
NICK ELLIS Board Member
ABIGAIL KETCHUM Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ERIN LANE Executive Director 10.4% of Rev
JASON BRAKE Board President
CONSTANCE KELLEY Treasurer
MARK LACK Secretary
SANDY SEIFERT Board President
PATSY CLEERE Board Member
NICK ELLIS Board Member
JODY GENTRY Board Member
MARISSA GIESECKE Board Member
FARRAH GOMEZ Board Member
ARIELLE PLESANT Board Member
TRENTON PRIDDY Board Member
EZRA RAMIREZ Board Member
ANDY TIGER Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ERIN LANE Executive Director 10.5% of Rev
JASON BRAKE Board President
CONSTANCE KELLEY Treasurer
MARK LACK Secretary
SANDY SEIFERT Board President
MARISSA GIESECKE Board Member
JODY GENTRY Board Member
WHITNEY WATSON WOOD Board Member
FARRAH GOMEZ Board Member
EZRA RAMIREZ Board Member
PATSY CLEERE Board Member
NICK ELLIS Board Member
ARIELLE PLEASANT Board Member
TRENTON PRIDDY Board Member
ANDY TIGER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
42 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 133 other orgs in TX with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points above the peer median (60 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.