Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
27
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 198.3% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2023 19.1% 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 9.0% 52 Fragile Recovery
2021 51.9% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 49.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 25.3% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2018 21.6% 47 Fragile Recovery
2017 24.4% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2016 24.1% 43 Fragile Recovery
2015 26.9% 40 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2014 27.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 29.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 21.5% 43 Fragile Recovery
2011 26.7% 38 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROBIN DEMOTT Board Member
LAURA HENSON Board Member
BRANDI PATTON Board Member
FISHER RINDERKNECHT Board Member
KIMBERLY DUNNAHOO Treasurer
KELIJON NANCE Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KIMBERLY DUNNAHOO Treasurer
KELIJON NANCE Board President
ROBIN DEMOTT Board Member
LAURA HENSON Board Member
BRANDI PATTON Board Member
FISHER RINDERKNECHT Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMANDA ARRAMBIDE PARLIAMENTAR
LAURA HENSON Board Member
BRANDI PATTON Board Member
FISHER RINDERKNECHT Board Member
HILLARY TRUSSELL Board Member
EMILY HOUSTON BARTON VICE PRESIDE
KIMBERLY DUNNAHOO Treasurer
ERICKA HORNSBY Secretary
KELIJON NANCE Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
27 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 27 other orgs in TX with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 15 points below the peer median (5 vs. 20).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

Overall score has gone from 32 → 27 over 5 years (declining by 5 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 198.3% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.