Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
44
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — 44 Fragile Recovery
2023 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 44 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — — 46 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — — 41 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 41 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — — 37 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LARRY LANDUSKY Board President —
BRYAN SMITHERMAN 924 - 1124 Board Member —
MATTHEW HART Board Member —
ANN LYNN AKIN Board Member —
GWEN BAIN Board Member —
MIMI PAPPAS Board Member —
ROBBIE VESTAL Board Member —
DANA HINDS Board Member —
ROBBI CRUMPLER 1024 - 625 Board Member —
ROGER TIPTON 1124 - 625 Board Member —
DARRELL BATEMAN 125 - 625 Board Member —
TRICIA REED 225 - 625 Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRICKLAND EASTON Board President —
ELAINE HILLIN 0622 - 1022 Secretary —
CHRISTY HOWARD Board Member —
BIRGIT GREEN Board Member —
BRYAN SMITHERMAN Board Member —
MATTHEW HART Board Member —
LINDA HUTCHINS 0622 - 0922 Board Member —
MARY SAATHOFF 0622 - 0922 Board Member —
ANN AKIN Board Member —
GWEN BAIN Board Member —
JOUANA STRAVLO Board Member —
MARION WILLIAMS Board Member —
BRYAN SMITHERMAN Board President —
CHRISTY HOWARD Board Member —
MATTHEW HART Board Member —
ANN AKIN Board Member —
GWEN BAIN Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOE BELGARA Board President —
BRICKLAND EASTON Board President —
ELAINE HILLIN 0921 - 0522 Secretary —
CHRISTY HOWARD 0921 - 0522 Board Member —
BIRGIT GREEN Board Member —
BRYAN SMITHERMAN 0921 - 0522 Board Member —
MATTHEW HART 1021 - 0522 Board Member —
LINDA HUTCHINS Board Member —
MARY SAATHOFF Board Member —
ANN AKIN 422 - 522 Board Member —
GWEN BAIN Board Member —
JOUANA STRAVLO Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOAN GOODMAN-WILLIAMSON Board President —
JOE BELGARA Board President —
ERIN DIPPREY Secretary —
BRICKLAND EASTON Board Member —
BIRGIT GREEN Board Member —
CHRIS KIMBLER Board Member —
ALVIN SNEED Board Member —
LINDA HUTCHINS Board Member —
MARY SAATHOFF Board Member —
PARKER SWINDLING 0620 - 0820 Board Member —
SHELLEY HARP 0620 - 0820 Board Member —
GWEN BAIN 0820 - 0521 Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 483 other orgs in TX with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 25 points below the peer median (50 vs. 75).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.