Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence ↓
Overall
28
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 29.2% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 — — 19.2% 35 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — 17.4% 43 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 13.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 11.5% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — 19.0% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 — — 14.1% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — 19.0% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — 19.1% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 16.2% 37 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 25.1% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — 19.6% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jim Jackson Artistic Director 15.4% of Rev
Birgitta DePree Artistic Director 2.8% of Rev
Seth Palmer Harris Board President —
Anna Faye Hunter Treasurer —
Ollie Glessner Secretary —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jim Jackson Executive Director 8.7% of Rev
Jim Jackson Executive Director 8.3% of Rev
Birgitta De Pree Treasurer 6.1% of Rev
Birgitta De Pree Treasurer 5.4% of Rev
Diane Salkovich Board Member 4.5% of Rev
Diane Salkovich Board Member 0.9% of Rev
David Ball Secretary —
Anna Faye Hunter Board Member —
David Ball Secretary —
Anna Faye Hunter Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jim Jackson Head 7.8% of Rev
Birgitta De Pree Treasurer 5.1% of Rev
David Ball Secretary —
Diane Salkovich Board Member —
Anna Faye Hunter Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
28 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 270 other orgs in CO with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 45 points below the peer median (5 vs. 50).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 29.2% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~14 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.