Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↓
Overall
19
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
20
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 109.8% 19 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 — — 41.1% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 — — 80.1% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 — — 64.8% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 — — 59.4% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — — 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — — 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — — 45 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 — — — 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREA ARIEL Executive Dir. 176.3% of Rev
ANDREA ARIEL Executive Dir. 109.8% of Rev
BEVERLY LOWRY Board Member —
CHARLOTTE MCCANN Board Member —
PATTI GRIFFITH Board President —
KHANI ZULU Board President —
SARAH MORGAN Board Member —
AMY CAMPBELL Treasurer —
MELODY FULLYLOVE Board Member —
MONICA MILLER Secretary —
BEVERLY LOWRY Board Member —
CHARLOTTE MCCANN Board Member —
PATTI GRIFFITH Board President —
KHANI ZULU Board President —
SARAH MORGAN Board Member —
AMY CAMPBELL Treasurer —
MELODY FULLYLOVE Board Member —
MONICA MILLER Secretary —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREA ARIEL Executive Dir. 159.5% of Rev
ANDREA ARIEL Executive Dir. 94.4% of Rev
KHANI ZULU Board President —
CINDY STEWARD Board Member —
WHITNEY O'BAUGH Board Member —
AMY CAMPBELL Treasurer —
MELODY FULLYLOVE Board Member —
MONICA MILLER Secretary —
BEVERLY LOWRY Board Member —
CHARLOTTE MCCANN Board Member —
PATTI GRIFFITH Board President —
KHANI ZULU Board President —
SARAH MORGAN Board Member —
AMY CAMPBELL Treasurer —
MELODY FULLYLOVE Board Member —
MONICA MILLER Secretary —
BEVERLY LOWRY Board Member —
CHARLOTTE MCCANN Board Member —
PATTI GRIFFITH Board President —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREA ARIEL Executive Dir. 126.0% of Rev
KHANI ZULU Board President —
CINDY STEWARD Board Member —
WHITNEY O'BAUGH Secretary —
AMY CAMPBELL Treasurer —
MELODY FULLYLOVE Board Member —
BEVERLY LOWRY Board Member —
CHARLOTTE MCCANN Board Member —
PATTI GRIFFITH Board President —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREA ARIEL Executive Dir. 87.1% of Rev
BEVERLY LOWRY Board President —
MOLLY BROWNING Board President —
CLAUDETTE LOWE Secretary —
CHARLOTTE MCCANN Board Member —
PATTI GRIFFITH Board Member —
KHANI ZULU Board Member —
CINDY STEWART Board Member —
WHITNEY O'BAUGH Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
20 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
19 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 483 other orgs in TX with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 47 points below the peer median (20 vs. 67).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 109.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.