Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
19
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
20
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 109.8% 19 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 41.1% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 80.1% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 64.8% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 59.4% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 45 Fragile Recovery
2014 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREA ARIEL Executive Dir. 176.3% of Rev
ANDREA ARIEL Executive Dir. 109.8% of Rev
BEVERLY LOWRY Board Member
CHARLOTTE MCCANN Board Member
PATTI GRIFFITH Board President
KHANI ZULU Board President
SARAH MORGAN Board Member
AMY CAMPBELL Treasurer
MELODY FULLYLOVE Board Member
MONICA MILLER Secretary
BEVERLY LOWRY Board Member
CHARLOTTE MCCANN Board Member
PATTI GRIFFITH Board President
KHANI ZULU Board President
SARAH MORGAN Board Member
AMY CAMPBELL Treasurer
MELODY FULLYLOVE Board Member
MONICA MILLER Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREA ARIEL Executive Dir. 159.5% of Rev
ANDREA ARIEL Executive Dir. 94.4% of Rev
KHANI ZULU Board President
CINDY STEWARD Board Member
WHITNEY O'BAUGH Board Member
AMY CAMPBELL Treasurer
MELODY FULLYLOVE Board Member
MONICA MILLER Secretary
BEVERLY LOWRY Board Member
CHARLOTTE MCCANN Board Member
PATTI GRIFFITH Board President
KHANI ZULU Board President
SARAH MORGAN Board Member
AMY CAMPBELL Treasurer
MELODY FULLYLOVE Board Member
MONICA MILLER Secretary
BEVERLY LOWRY Board Member
CHARLOTTE MCCANN Board Member
PATTI GRIFFITH Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREA ARIEL Executive Dir. 126.0% of Rev
KHANI ZULU Board President
CINDY STEWARD Board Member
WHITNEY O'BAUGH Secretary
AMY CAMPBELL Treasurer
MELODY FULLYLOVE Board Member
BEVERLY LOWRY Board Member
CHARLOTTE MCCANN Board Member
PATTI GRIFFITH Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREA ARIEL Executive Dir. 87.1% of Rev
BEVERLY LOWRY Board President
MOLLY BROWNING Board President
CLAUDETTE LOWE Secretary
CHARLOTTE MCCANN Board Member
PATTI GRIFFITH Board Member
KHANI ZULU Board Member
CINDY STEWART Board Member
WHITNEY O'BAUGH Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
20 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
19 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 132 other orgs in TX with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points below the peer median (5 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 109.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.