Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
32
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 9.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 10.8% 44 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 24.4% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 23.3% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 16.4% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 14.8% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 11.3% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 9.8% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 12.6% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 12.9% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 5.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 7.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 10.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Airanne P Marcee Executive Director 7.7% of Rev
Justin Lucero Board Member 2.4% of Rev
Mariana Sandoval Office & Social Media Manager 2.4% of Rev
Sondra Santella Board Member
Jay Stratton Board Member
Kimberly Wolfenbarger-Nakamoto Board Member
Omar Rodriguez Board Member
Robert Holguin Board Member
Adrian Ordonez Board Member
Michael White Treasurer
Chelsea Lamego Board President
Andrea Spier Secretary
Marcela Flores Fernandez Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Arianne P Marcee Executive Director 7.4% of Rev
Mariana Sandoval Office & Social Media Manager 2.6% of Rev
Justin Lucero Board Member 2.3% of Rev
Jay Stratton Board Member
Sondra Santaella Board Member
Stacy Hunter Spier Board President
Kimberly Wolfenbarger-Nakamoto Board Member
Robert Holguin Board Member
Adrian Ordonez Board Member
Omar Rodriquez Board Member
Michael White Treasurer
Chelsea Lamego Board President
Andrea Spier Secretary
Marcela Flores Fernandez Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ARIANNE P MARCEE Executive Director 7.1% of Rev
MARIANA SANDOVAL OFFICE & SOCIAL MEDIA MANA 2.7% of Rev
JUSTIN LUCERO Board Member 2.4% of Rev
MICHAEL WHITE Treasurer
STACY HUNT SPIER Board President
GEORGE DE LA TORRE Board Member
CHELSEA LAMEGO Board Member
ELISA SAMANIEGO Board Member
JAMES STRATTON Board Member
KIMBERLEY WOLFENBARGER-NAKAMOTO Board Member
MARECELA FLORES FERNANDEZ Board Member
OMAR RODRIGUEZ Board Member
ANDREA SPIER Secretary
KELLIE RUMBA -RATTAY Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
32 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 132 other orgs in TX with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 32 points below the peer median (0 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 24 → 32 over 5 years (improving by 8 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.