Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
59
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
100
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 59 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 62 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 46 Fragile Recovery
2019 44 Fragile Recovery
2018 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 49 Fragile Recovery
2016 45 Fragile Recovery
2015 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kaye Lowak Board President
Noreen McMahan Board President
Kevin McClure At Large
Sara Burden-McClure Artistic Director

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sara Burden-McClure Artistic Director
Kaye Lowak Board President
Noreen McMahan Board President
Melba Robbins Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sara Burden-McClure Artistic Director
Kaye Lowak Board President
Noreen McMahan Board President
Melba Robbins At-Large
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
100 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
59 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 133 other orgs in TX with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 68 points above the peer median (100 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 44 → 59 over 5 years (improving by 15 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.